Question
Why does Epictetus say to remind yourself that your child will die?
A look at why Epictetus tells you to remember your child's mortality while kissing them, and why that is not coldness but clarity.
Updated
The short answer
Epictetus wants you to see your child as what she actually is: a human being, and therefore mortal, not a possession guaranteed to you forever. The reminder is meant to correct a false judgment, not to make you love less. By keeping her mortality in view, you avoid the shock and protest that come from treating something not up to you as if it were yours to keep.
Key points
- Epictetus gives the reminder as a method: start with trivial things like a ceramic cup, then apply the same logic to people you love.
- In the Discourses he puts the line directly in your mouth while kissing your child, to make the exercise concrete.
- He anticipates the objection that this sounds like a bad omen and answers that usefulness, not omen, is what matters.
- Handbook 11 reframes a child's death as a return rather than a loss, since nothing external was ever truly yours to keep.
- The point connects to the dichotomy of control: other people are not up to you, only your own judgments and actions are.
- Taking the practice seriously changes how you love someone, not how much.
The longer answer
The point is not to feel less
Epictetus is not telling you to love your child less or to brace for grief by going numb. He is telling you to see your child accurately: as a human being, and therefore as mortal. In the Handbook he gives the instruction as a general method, starting from trivial cases and working up. If you are fond of a ceramic cup, remind yourself it is a ceramic cup, so that if it breaks you are not disturbed (Handbook 3). He then applies the same move to the people you love most: "If you kiss your child, or your wife, say that you only kiss things which are human, and thus you will not be disturbed if either of them dies" (Handbook 3).
In the Discourses he gives the line its sharpest form. He imagines actually saying it, out loud, mid-kiss: "What harm is it while you are kissing your child to say with a lisping voice, To-morrow you will die" (Discourses 3.24). He knows how this sounds. He immediately names the objection himself: people will call it a bad omen, words you should not speak over someone you love. His answer is blunt: he does not care whether it sounds ominous, only whether it is useful (Discourses 3.24).
What the reminder is actually doing
The reminder is not a prediction and not a wish. It is a correction of a false judgment you are prone to make without noticing it: that your child is the kind of thing that will not die, or that is somehow yours to keep. Epictetus's whole method rests on the distinction between what is up to us and what is not. Your opinions, your desires, your own actions are up to you. Other people, including the people you love, are not (Handbook 1). A child is a human being on loan, not a possession you hold by right.
Handbook 11 makes this explicit with a different image. Don't say "I have lost" a child or a wife who has died, Epictetus says, say "I have returned" them, the way a traveler returns something borrowed. "Is your child dead? It is returned" (Handbook 11). Take care of what is given to you, he adds, but do not regard it as your own, the way a traveler at an inn does not treat the room as his house (Handbook 11).
What changes if you take this seriously
If you actually run this exercise, something shifts in how you hold the people you love. You stop loving them as fixtures and start loving them as what they are: fragile, temporary, not under your control, and for exactly that reason worth your full attention now. The reminder is aimed at removing a specific kind of disturbance, the shock and protest that come from having believed something false, not at reducing how much you care. Epictetus is explicit that the goal is not to be hindered, not to lament, not to find fault with gods or men when something not up to you goes the way nature always said it would (Handbook 1).
This is also why the Stoics did not treat death only as a future threat to dread but as a fact to place beside present happiness, the way winter stands behind every fig (Discourses 3.24). The practical version of the exercise is simple. Tonight, when you say goodnight to someone you love, let yourself notice, without flinching away from it, that this will not always be possible. Then give them your full attention anyway.
Primary passages
If you kiss your child, or your wife, say that you only kiss things which are human, and thus you will not be disturbed if either of them dies.
Epictetus, Handbook 3 Read in context
The core instruction: naming what a person is, in general, so that grief does not come from a false judgment.
What harm is it while you are kissing your child to say with a lisping voice, To-morrow you will die
Epictetus, Discourses III 24 Read in context
Epictetus's most vivid version of the exercise, spoken in the very moment of affection.
Never say of anything, "I have lost it"; but, "I have returned it. Is your child dead? It is returned.
Epictetus, Handbook 11 Read in context
A parallel formula: a child is on loan, not owned, which reframes death as return rather than loss.
While he gives it to you to possess, take care of it; but don't view it as your own, just as travelers view a hotel.
Epictetus, Handbook 11 Read in context
The image that captures the attitude Epictetus wants: full care, without false ownership.
Important distinctions
Premeditation versus prediction
Epictetus is not forecasting that your child will die soon, and he is not performing a superstitious ritual. He is stating a general fact about human beings, applied in advance, so that if and when it happens, you are not undone by a judgment you never examined.
Not loving less, but loving accurately
The exercise can sound like a method for emotional distance. It is closer to the opposite: loving someone as the mortal, borrowed, fragile person they are, rather than as a fixture you have quietly assumed will always be there.
Objections and replies
This sounds like bad luck, or just cruel, to say over a child
Epictetus himself records this objection: his hearers call these words of bad omen, something you should not speak over someone you love.
Epictetus answers directly that he does not care whether a form of words sounds ominous, only whether it is useful (Discourses 3.24). The test is not etiquette but whether the thought protects you from being wrecked by a false judgment later.
Doesn't this just numb you to loss in advance
If you keep telling yourself your child will die, you might worry this trains you to feel less, or to withdraw some of your care now so the loss costs you less later.
Nothing in Handbook 3 or 11 asks you to care less. The instruction is to stop assuming ownership you never had, which is a correction of belief, not a dimming of affection. Epictetus pairs the reminder with full present care in Handbook 11: take care of what is given to you, while it is given.
Practice this in Stoa
Guided courses in the Stoa app that put this into daily practice.
Related questions
-
What does Epictetus mean by keeping death before your eyes daily?
A look at Handbook 21 and why Epictetus thinks a daily awareness of death, not fear of it, keeps you free.
-
What do the Stoics say about death?
A look at why the Stoics treat death as neither good nor evil, and how keeping it in view is meant to sharpen how you live rather than frighten you.
-
What is memento mori and how do you practice it?
Learn what the Stoics meant by keeping death in view, and how Epictetus, Marcus Aurelius, and Seneca actually practiced it.
-
What is the Stoic teaching of the two handles in Epictetus's Handbook?
A short teaching from Epictetus on choosing how to grasp what happens to you, and why that choice is up to you even when the event is not.
-
What maxims does Epictetus recommend keeping ready at hand?
A look at the three quotations Epictetus tells his students to hold close, and what they teach about accepting what is not up to us.
-
According to Epictetus, how should duties be determined between family members?
Epictetus grounds family duty in the relation itself, not in how well the other person plays their part.
-
How does Epictetus say to master desire?
A look at what Epictetus actually recommends in the Handbook: not indulging desire, but redirecting it toward what is up to you.
-
How does Epictetus say we should respond when someone insults or wrongs us?
Epictetus argues that a person who insults you is not attacking something of yours, and that this fact should change how you respond.
Podcast discussions
-
Why the Trichotomy of Control Misreads Epictetus
Michael Tremblay and Caleb Ontiveros argue that William Irvine's popular "trichotomy of control" distorts Epictetus's dichotomy between what is up to us and what is not.
-
Michael Trombley and Caleb on Emily Wilson's Critique of Epictetus
Michael Trombley and Caleb examine classicist Emily Wilson's three criticisms of Epictetus and test whether they hold up against the Discourses and Handbook.
-
The Stoics vs. Plato: Blank Slate or Innate Ideas
Michael Tremblay and Caleb Ontiveros compare the Stoic view of the mind as a blank slate with Plato's theory of innate knowledge, and what each means for self-knowledge.
Related concepts, philosophers and works
Sources
- Epictetus, Discourses III Primary text, Stoa library
- Epictetus, Handbook Primary text, Stoa library